Avalanche schreef:Ik vond Peter Hyatt erg interessant. De body language experts minder. Ik nam dat heel serieus tot ik een andere video zag die dat volledig onderuithaalde als pseudo science.
Peter Hyatt is anders wat, die man weet echt wel waar hij over praat.
Je realiseert je dat wat Hyatt doet net zo goed pseudoscience is he?
Citaat:
Proponents say statement analysis has proven effective as a police interrogation technique, but critics argue that it has not been subjected to objective analysis, with most of the studies failing to have used any outside criteria to confirm whether the statements were actually true or false. As it has not been proven experimentally and is generally unaccepted by courts, skeptics call it an example of pseudoscience.
Statement analysis in general has been criticized as "theoretically vague" with little or no empirical evidence in its favor, and SCAN in particular has been characterized as "junk science"[1] with the Skeptic's Dictionary and Skeptical Inquirer magazine[12] classifying it as a form of pseudoscience
Laatst bijgewerkt door IMANDRA op 29-03-23 21:27, in het totaal 3 keer bewerkt